Features | Partner Sites | Information | LinkXpress
Sign In
Schiller
Primedic
Ampronix

Fraud Detection Tool Predicts Hospital Quality

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 16 Oct 2013
A new study reexamines patient satisfaction scores in measuring hospital quality, putting into use a health-care fraud tool.

Researchers at Thomas Jefferson University (Philadelphia, PA, USA) developed a theoretical model to justify the application of PRIDIT—a method originally developed for the detection of health-care fraud—in the investigation of hospital quality. They then applied the PRIDIT method to a national, multiyear data set on US hospital quality variables and outcomes, creating a steady, predictable scale for hospital quality so that actuaries could map out reimbursement rates over years for programs like Medicare and the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act (ACTA).

The results demonstrate how the PRIDIT method can be used to predict future health outcomes based on currently available quality measures. The method scoring of hospital quality includes indicators such as patient satisfaction and medical outcomes, and is weighted heavily by factors such as mortality rates and the number of beds at the hospital, as more beds indicates more cases and better outcomes. Under the model, a patient in a highly rated hospital might dislike the noise and bad food, but survive a life-threatening heart attack. The study was published online on September 30, 2013, in Risk Management and Insurance Review.

“There is a lot of information patients can use to select a hospital. However, this is usually a laundry list of indicators that may not mean much for the lay person, or that they may be unaware even exists,” said lead author Assistant Professor Robert D. Lieberthal, PhD, of the school of population health. “Our method compares hospitals directly, so that a patient choosing between two or three hospitals can easily compare them and choose the highest quality facility.”

The PRIDIT method makes use of fraud predictor variables to obtain an overall suspicion score for each claim, and to classify these claims accordingly without access to a set of audited claims. It is based on a scoring technique called RIDIT (Relative to an Identified Distribution Integral Transform) analysis developed for epidemiological literature.

Related Links:

Thomas Jefferson University




Armstrong Medical Industries
IIMTC
JD Honigberg International
DeRoyal

Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel

Osteoporotic Fracture Risk Higher in Patients with Scleroderma

The risk of osteoporotic fractures (OFs) was raised among patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), and particularly among women, according to a new study. Researchers at Taipei Medical University (New Taipei City, Taiwan) conducted a cohort study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance database to identify the incidence... Read more

Women's Health

view channel

Medical and Surgical Abortion Are Equally Effective

Virtually no difference exists between the effectiveness of medical and surgical abortions during the first trimester, according to a new study. Researchers at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; USA; www.ucla.edu) conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing efficacy of medical and surgical abortion... Read more
 

Events

31 Jul 2015 - 02 Aug 2015
Copyright © 2000-2015 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.