We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Feather Safety Razor

Download Mobile App


ATTENTION: Due to the COVID-19 PANDEMIC, many events are being rescheduled for a later date, converted into virtual venues, or altogether cancelled. Please check with the event organizer or website prior to planning for any forthcoming event.
26 Oct 2021 - 28 Oct 2021
Virtual Venue

Full-Length ITR Improves Nasal Airflow Best

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 19 Feb 2018
Print article
Image: A new study suggests nasal turbinate reduction improves airflow best (Photo courtesy of TheRespiratorySystem.com).
Image: A new study suggests nasal turbinate reduction improves airflow best (Photo courtesy of TheRespiratorySystem.com).
A new study suggests that full-length inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) is the most effective treatment option for nasal obstruction.

Researchers at Ohio State University (OSU, Columbus, USA) and Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (VCUMC; Richmond, USA) conducted an investigational study in five patients using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate airflow changes after reduction along different portions of the inferior turbinate. Using computerized tomography (CT) scans, the researchers created seven CFD models for each patient. These included one unaltered, three one-third ITRs (anterior, middle, and posterior); two two-thirds ITRs (anterior and posterior two-thirds); and one full-length ITR model.

Total airflow rate and nasal resistance was obtained through CFD analysis, and regression analysis was performed on the increased nasal volume, locations, and nasal resistance. The results showed that for all five patients, ITR over the whole length was consistently most effective in improving nasal airflow and resistance, when adjusted for volume. The effectiveness of posterior or anterior ITR was not consistent, and even within one individual, the site of most effective partial ITR differed from one side to the other. The study was published on January 25, 2018, in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.

“ITR is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of nasal obstruction. Which portion of the inferior turbinates should be surgically addressed to improve nasal airflow has yet to be determined,” concluded lead author Thomas Lee, MD, of VCUMC, and colleagues. “The fact that full ITRs were consistently most effective, and the linear regression between flow and nasal volume changes, may indicate that the entire length of the inferior turbinate has a functional impact on nasal airflow and resistance.”

There are three turbinates (inferior, middle, and superior) on each side of the nose, composed of a ridge of bone lined with thick, well vascularized soft tissue and covered by a moist mucous membrane; the turbinates clean and humidify the air as it moves into the lungs. The inferior turbinates are the largest, and when irreversibly enlarged from chronic inflammation or congenital enlargement, IRT or submucous resection is performed as an outpatient procedure to improve airflow.

Related Links:
Ohio State University
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Print article


Copyright © 2000-2021 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.