We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Debate Continues on Breast Cancer Screening, Clinical Breast Examination

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 17 Sep 2009
Recent research revealed that breast cancer detection rates and sensitivity were higher, but so were false-positive rates, among mammography centers that offered clinical breast examination in addition to mammography. More...
Controversy exists about whether adding clinical breast examination to mammography improves the accuracy of breast screening.

To address this, Anna M. Chiarelli, Ph.D., from the Populations Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario (Toronto, Canada), and colleagues compared the accuracy of screening among centers that offered clinical breast examination in addition to mammography with that of centers offering only mammography.

Using a cohort of more than 290,000 women within the Ontario Breast Screening Program screened between January 2002 and December 2003, the researchers found that the sensitivity of referrals was higher for women who were screened at centers that offered clinical breast examination and mammography than for women who were screened at centers that did not offer clinical breast examination. However, women without cancer who were screened at centers that offered clinical breast examination had a higher false-positive rate than women screened at centers that offered only mammography.

"Overall, we found higher breast cancer detection rates and sensitivities for [clinical breast examination] referral than those previously found in other community-based studies, which suggests that the accuracy of [clinical breast examination] can be improved in screening programs that offer high-quality [clinical breast examinations] by specially trained nurses,” the authors wrote in their report, published online August 31, 2009, in the Journal of the [U.S.] National Cancer Institute. However, they noted, the benefits of adding clinical breast examination must be weighed against potential risks and costs due to false-positive results and the anxiety associated with additional evaluations.

In an accompanying editorial, Mary B. Barton, M.D., MPP, of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Rockville, MD, USA), and Joann G. Elmore, M.D., MPH, of the University of Washington School of Medicine (Seattle, WA, USA) noted the "steep price” for the potential gains of adding clinical breast examination to mammography.

For a theoretic population of 10,000 women between the ages of 50 and 69 years, the addition of clinical breast examination would lead to the detection of breast cancer in only four women whose cancer would be missed by mammography. However, adding clinical breast examination would also lead to false-positive results for an additional 219 women, the editorialists point out.

"More answers are needed on the role of [clinical breast examination] in breast cancer screening before definitive recommendations for or against its use can be made,” the investigators reported. "While we wait for those answers, the data presented by Chiarelli et al suggest that [clinical breast examination] must be done well if it is to be done at all, with the acknowledgment that overall referrals and false-positive results will increase.”

Related Links:

Populations Studies and Surveillance, Cancer Care Ontario



Gold Member
12-Channel ECG
CM1200B
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Patient Monitoring System
AlarmSense
POC Respiratory/Sore Throat Test
BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE (R/ST) Panel
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image Cedit: Shutterstock

New Light-Activated Platform Advances Glioblastoma Surgery and Postoperative Treatment

Glioblastoma, an aggressive primary brain tumor, infiltrates healthy tissue and resists complete surgical removal. Residual microscopic disease and the blood–brain barrier limit the effectiveness of adjuvant... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.