We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Study Compares Effectiveness of Diagnosis Rules

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 01 May 2017
The results of a prospective observational study of children with head injuries, in Australian and New Zealand tertiary hospitals, have compared the diagnostic accuracy of three clinical decision rules used in emergency units.

Children with head injuries often undergo Computed Tomography (CT) scans in emergency departments to rule out serious brain injury, however not all children with milder injuries need such a scan. More...
Unnecessary radiation exposure from CT scans can increase the risk of cancer.

The results of the study were published online in the April 11, 2017, issue of the journal The Lancet. The goal of the study was to find the best clinical decision rules to help emergency medicine clinicians decide which children under 18 years of age, suffering from head injuries, needed a CT scan. The study included 20,137 children in ten Australian and New Zealand tertiary hospitals.

The researchers found that the US Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) clinical decision rule provided the best options for identifying children with a very low risk of a traumatic brain injury. The results compared the PECARN rule with the Canadian CATCH, and UK CHALICE rules. Only the PECARN rule was able to determine all patients requiring neurosurgery.

Associate Professor Franz Babl, lead investigator of the trail, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, said, "The aim of this study was to determine which children need CT scans to detect brain injury. Most head injuries are mild and don't require neurosurgical management, however, a small proportion of patients might present as having mild injuries, but have clinically significant intracranial injuries. The preferred course of treatment is to avoid a CT scan in minor head injuries if it is unnecessary. In particular, there is concern about the high radiation dose associated with CT scans of the head which can lead to cancer."


Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
New
Gold Member
Breast Imaging Monitor
Barco Coronis Onelook MDMC-32133 32MP
Glucose Meter
StatStrip®
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Graphical Abstract (Aoibhin M. Sheedy et al., A replenishable peritoneal implant for localized delivery and peritoneal fluid sampling in ovarian cancer, Device (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.device.2026.101050)

New Implant Provides Sustained Localized Therapy for Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages because symptoms such as bloating, pain, and pelvic pressure are nonspecific. Standard care relies on surgery and systemic therapy, yet tools for targeted... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.