We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Study Reveals Value of Using Both Human and AI in Detecting Breast Cancer

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 29 Apr 2022

Radiologists and artificial intelligence (AI) systems yield significant differences in breast-cancer screenings, according to a new study, revealing the potential value of using both human and AI methods in making medical diagnoses. More...

The analysis by a team of researchers at New York University (New York, NY, USA) centered on a specific AI tool: Deep neural networks (DNNs), which are layers of computing elements - “neurons” - simulated on a computer. A network of such neurons can be trained to “learn” by building many layers and configuring how calculations are performed based on data input - a process called “deep learning.” The scientists compared breast-cancer screenings read by radiologists with those analyzed by DNNs.

The researchers found that DNNs and radiologists diverged significantly in how they diagnose a category of malignant breast cancer called soft tissue lesions. While radiologists primarily relied on brightness and shape, the DNNs used tiny details scattered across the images. These details were also concentrated outside of the regions deemed most important by radiologists. By revealing such differences between human and machine perception in medical diagnosis, the researchers moved to close the gap between academic study and clinical practice.

“While AI may offer benefits in healthcare, its decision-making is still poorly understood,” explains Taro Makino, a doctoral candidate in NYU’s Center for Data Science and the paper’s lead author. “Our findings take an important step in better comprehending how AI yields medical assessments and, with it, offer a way forward in enhancing cancer detection.”

“The major bottleneck in moving AI systems into the clinical workflow is in understanding their decision-making and making them more robust,” added Makino. “We see our research as advancing the precision of AI’s capabilities in making health-related assessments by illuminating, and then addressing, its current limitations.”

“In these breast-cancer screenings, AI systems consider tiny details in mammograms that are seen as irrelevant by radiologists,” explained Krzysztof Geras, Ph.D., faculty in NYU Grossman School of Medicine’s Department of Radiology. “This divergence in readings must be understood and corrected before we can trust AI systems to help make life-critical medical decisions.”

Related Links:
New York University 


Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Radiology Monitor
MDNC-6121 Barco Nio Color 5.8MP
Medical-Grade Display
HL2316SHTB
Radiofrequency Generator
GX1
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Artificial Intelligence

view channel
Image: Artificial intelligence (AI) standalone performance and reader performance with versus without AI assistance. (A) Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for AI standalone performance in the US dataset (AUC 0.899, 95% CI 0.858 to 0.939). (B) ROC curve for AI standalone performance in the Korean dataset (AUC 0.963, 95% CI 0.946 to 0.975). (C) Pooled reader ROC without (AUC 0.718) versus with (AUC 0.852) AI assistance in the Korean dataset; P<0.001. AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. (Leonard Sunwoo et al., Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (2026). DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2026-025339)

AI Improves Non-Contrast CT Interpretation for Time-Sensitive Stroke Assessment

Acute ischemic stroke occurs when a blood vessel in the brain becomes blocked, requiring rapid diagnosis to enable timely reperfusion therapy. Emergency departments often use computed tomography angiography... Read more

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Needle-Free Intrauterine Anesthesia Technique Reduces Pain During IUD Insertion

Pain during intrauterine device (IUD) placement often deters women from choosing this long-acting contraception. Avoiding or undertreating procedural pain can reduce uptake and satisfaction with effective... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Identifies Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults Without Diabetes

Dysglycemia—abnormal blood glucose regulation—can fluctuate throughout the day and often escape conventional screening. Clinicians typically rely on fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c, which offer... Read more

Business

view channel
Image: LigaSure RAS Maryland, designed for the Valleylab FT10 platform on Hugo RAS, seals and cuts vessels, tissue, and lymphatics up to 7 mm in diameter (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Medtronic Receives FDA Clearance for Vessel-Sealing Instrument for Robotic Surgery

As robotic-assisted surgery expands across U.S. hospitals, teams increasingly seek energy instruments with the familiarity and performance of tools used in open and laparoscopic procedures.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.