We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




CT Lung Cancer Screening No Panacea for Smokers

By MedImaging staff writers
Posted on 02 Jul 2008
Screening for lung cancer with computed tomography (CT) imaging may help decrease lung cancer deaths in current and former smokers, but it will not protect them from other causes of death associated with smoking, according to a new study. More...


The recent research was published in the July 2008 issue of the journal Radiology. "Our study suggests that screening may be one way to reduce risk of death from lung cancer,” said the study's lead author, Pamela McMahon, Ph.D., a senior scientist from Massachusetts General Hospital and instructor in radiology at Harvard Medical School (both in Boston, MA, USA). "However, the number-one goal should still be to quit smoking, because it will reduce risk of death from many causes, including lung cancer.”

For the study, researchers from Harvard and the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA), set out to determine the long-term effectiveness of CT screening for lung cancer by entering data from Mayo's helical CT screening study of 1,520 current and former smokers into the Lung Cancer Policy Model (LCPM), a comprehensive simulation model of lung cancer development, screening findings, treatment results, and long-term outcomes. Using the model allowed researchers to interpret available data while waiting for long-term randomized clinical trials to be completed.

"We used a carefully developed computer model of lung cancer to simulate individuals who smoke and/or develop lung cancers and go on to get screened or treated,” Dr. McMahon said. "It's sort of like the computer game ‘The Sims,' except there are no graphics, and smoking and lung cancer are the main events.”

The LCPM projections showed that, at six-year follow-up, the patients who had undergone five annual screenings had an estimated 37% relative increase in lung cancer detection, compared with those who had not been screened. The relative reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality was 28%. However, reduction in all-cause mortality was only 4%. Fifteen-year follow-up showed relative reductions in lung cancer-specific mortality of 15% and all-cause mortality of 2%.

"Our study fills in a piece of the puzzle but does not solve it,” Dr. McMahon said. "We are hopeful that randomized trials conducted by the [U.S.] National Cancer Institute will show a benefit from screening. Until then, patients should think carefully about undergoing a test that has no direct evidence of benefit.”


Related Links:
Massachusetts General Hospital
Mayo Clinic

Gold Member
12-Channel ECG
CM1200B
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Immobilization System
Cranial 4Pi Immobilization
Fetal Monitor
BT-380
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: The Aliya EX Generator for surgical ablation of soft tissue (Photo courtesy of Galvanize Therapeutics)

Next-Generation PEF System Delivers Larger Ablation Zones for Soft-Tissue Procedures

Interventional teams often need soft-tissue ablation options that can be performed percutaneously or endoscopically while minimizing collateral injury and preserving procedural workflow.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.