Endoscopic Ultrasound Highly Effective in Assessing Ambiguous Radiographic Findings of the Pancreas

The study conducted by researchers from St. Louis University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO, USA), appeared in the August 2008 issue of the journal Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GIE).

Occasionally, patients who are asymptomatic or who have nonspecific symptoms, such as weight loss and abdominal pain, have slight abnormal or incidental findings on CT and/or MRI that raise suspicion for pancreatic cancer. These modalities have relatively low specificity (ability to definitively discern between various diagnoses) in this setting. Perhaps due to a concern of missing early, small pancreatic tumors, clinicians who perform EUS are increasingly referred patients with subtle CT or MRI findings such as "enlarged pancreatic head” or "dilation of the pancreatic duct (widening of the main duct coursing through the pancreas).”

Endoscopic ultrasound and EUS-FNA have become a valuable tool in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. This technique allows for detection and possible needle biopsy of small pancreatic tumors even before they can be visualized as a subtle mass with CT or MRI.

"Often, patients with these radiologic findings are referred for EUS in lieu of waiting for repeated imaging. Our study looked to determine the performance characteristics of EUS and/or EUS with FNA in diagnosing a pancreatic tumor in this patient population,” said study lead author Banke Agarwal, M.D., from Saint Louis University School of Medicine. "We found that EUS and/or an EUS-FNA for diagnosing a pancreatic neoplasm was 99.1% accurate with 88.8% sensitivity and 100% specificity.”

Endoscopic ultrasound consists of a flexible endoscope that has a small ultrasound device built into the end. The ultrasound component generates sound waves that create visual images of the digestive tract that extend beyond the inner surface lining. EUS can be used to evaluate an abnormality below the surface such as a growth that was detected at a prior endoscopy or by X-ray. EUS can also be used to diagnose diseases of the pancreas, bile duct, and gallbladder when other tests are inconclusive, and can be used to determine the stage of tumors. Tissue samples, using a fine needle aspiration technique (FNA), can be obtained in real time with EUS guidance should an abnormality be seen.

This study was a retrospective analysis of 110 patients, mean age 60.3 years, from a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent an EUS and/or EUS-FNA at St. Louis University Hospital between March 2002 and March 2006 for suspected pancreatic cancer based on an abnormal CT and/or MRI who were reported as having an enlarged HOP or dilation of the PD (with or without a dilated common bile duct). An EUS examination was initially performed by using a radial echoendoscope. Whenever a suspicious mass was identified on radial EUS, an FNA was performed using a linear echoendoscope. Fine-needle aspirates were submitted for cytology and biochemical analysis. A final diagnosis was based on definitive cytology, surgical pathology, or clinical follow-up of 12 months or more (median follow-up was 16 months).

Researchers found that 6% of patients referred because of an enlarged HOP on a CT and/or an MRI scan and 11.5% of patients referred for a dilated PD had a pancreatic neoplasm. The diagnostic accuracy of an EUS and/or EUS-FNA in these patients for diagnosing a pancreatic neoplasm was 99.1%. Furthermore, no patient with enlarged HOP, but without a mass at EUS, went on to develop cancer.

In conclusion, the researchers demonstrated that a pancreatic neoplasm is present in a clinically significant number of patients with an enlarged HOP or dilated PD detected on a CT and/or MRI scan performed for evaluation of nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal pain or weight loss. They also observed that an EUS and/or EUS-FNA are highly accurate for the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasm in these patients. Based on these data, researchers recommend that an EUS and/or EUS-FNA be considered as the valid next test in the evaluation of patients with such imaging findings.

Related Links:
St. Louis University School of Medicine