Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Proton Therapy Reduces Side Effects for Pediatric Head, Neck Cancer Patients

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 09 Oct 2013
The precise targeting and careful dosing of radiation using proton therapy is beneficial in continuing efforts to reduce treatment side effects among head and neck cancer patients, according to a new study of pediatric patients.

The study’s findings were presented September 23, 2013, at the 55th annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) conference, held in Atlanta, GA, USA. More...
“Children are especially susceptible to the side effects of radiation therapy, and treating them for head and neck cancers poses an additional challenge due to the risk of radiation to developing tissues,” said the study’s lead author, Christine Hill-Kayser, MD, an assistant professor of radiation oncology in Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania’s (Philadelphia, USA) Abramson Cancer Center. “Our findings using proton therapy for these patients, however, show that side effects are milder than those which are typically seen among children undergoing conventional radiation. We hope that this will translate to mean fewer late effects as they survive their cancer.”

Although physicians have hypothesized about reduced toxicity and side effects with proton therapy because the modality spares most normal tissue from damage, clinical data on the new approach have not yet matured, particularly among pediatric cancer patients. The present study sought to shed more light on the issue by tracking a group of 25 patients, ranging in age from 1 to 21 years, all of whom received proton therapy at Penn Medicine’s Roberts Proton Therapy as part of their treatment for a range of head and neck cancers, including Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and salivary gland tumors. Treatment toxicity was evaluated weekly during proton treatment and every one to three months after that.

After a median of 13 months after treatment, 19 patients (76%) have no evidence of disease, three patients (12%) had developed local recurrence, and five (20%) had tumors that seemed to be stable. One patient died of their cancer. The investigators noted that these outcomes are typically similar to those that would be expected with more conventional X-ray therapy. More importantly, however, were the greatly reduced side effects seen in the study, compared to the prevalence seen among head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. “The side-effects profile was really very mild, with basically no high-grade toxicity,” said Dr. Hill-Kayser, who conducted the study along with colleagues from both Penn Medicine and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

The most common side effects were fatigue and dermatitis. The researchers noted that while skin reactions are frequently observed during radiation treatment, this study seemed to indicate a somewhat greater reaction than expected when proton treatment was followed by specific chemotherapeutic agents, including actinomycin-d and doxorubicin, which can interact with radiation and cause radiation sensitivity. That finding helped the researcher to further customize their approach to minimize that side effect. “If we started those drugs right away after proton therapy, it seemed the dermatitis was worse,” Dr. Hill-Kayser said. “So we learned that after proton therapy, we wanted to hold those drugs and not give them for a month to six weeks, so the patient had time to recover from the skin toxicity before it got worse.”

Another typical side effect of radiation therapy—particularly among head and neck cancer patients—can be weight loss and nutritional problems, but those were also only found to be a slight concern for the patients in the current study. “It’s common to lose some weight during radiation treatment because the mouth and throat get inflamed, but we found that very few patients in our study lost more than 10% of their body weight during the course of treatment. We found that we could minimize that weight loss by using a gastrostomy tube to give tube feedings, but even when we didn't do that, the weight loss was manageable. This was likely the case because proton therapy allowed us to decrease the radiation dose to the mouth and throat compared to equivalent plans using X-ray therapy.”

Over one to three months, all of the study patients fully recovered from any acute side effects from the proton treatment. Dr. Hill-Kayser expects that this research will help to support the growing consensus that “pediatrics is one of the areas where proton therapy is going to provide a lot of benefit.”

Related Links:
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania





Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Hybrid Arch Device
Neo EDE
Medical Adhesive
MED 5570U
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Sphere-9 is the first all-in-one mapping and ablation, large-tip focal, dual-energy catheter to be CE marked for ventricular ablation (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Dual-Energy Mapping and Ablation Catheter Receives CE Mark for Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes, can be life-threatening and often occur in patients with advanced heart disease. Although catheter ablation... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.