We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Ultrasound Safer, Just as Effective as X-Ray Screening in the ICU

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 06 Nov 2013
A new study shows that the use of ultrasound testing instead of X-rays or computed tomography (CT) scanning in the intensive care unit (ICU) reduces patient radiation exposure and lowers costs of care. More...


The study’s findings were presented at CHEST 2013, the annual meeting of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), held October 26-31, 2013, in Chicago (IL, USA). “We found that the use of ultrasound to diagnose patients greatly reduced radiation exposure for patients without negatively affecting their health,” said Margarita Oks, MD, from Long Island Jewish (LIJ) Hospital North Shore-LIJ Health System (Glen Oaks, NY, USA). “It was also cost-effective.”

Dr. Oks and her colleagues assessed medical charts covering three months of information comparing chest X-rays, CT scans, and ultrasound between two independent but similar medical ICUs staffed by the same medical house personnel in one healthcare system. One unit used bedside ultrasound as the standard of care for diagnosis; the second used traditional imaging, such as X-rays and CT scans, as its standard of care in diagnosis.

Researchers discovered that there were 5.21 X-rays performed per patient stay in the ICU using X-rays and CT scans, whereas there were 1.10 X-rays per patient stay in the unit using ultrasound as the standard of care. Total CT scans per patient stay were 0.91 in the non-ultrasound ICU vs. 0.26 in the ultrasound unit. There were 0.27 cardiac echocardiograms per patient stay in the non-ultrasound ICU vs. 0.11 in the ultrasound ICU. Mortality rates did not vary greatly, with 0.27 in the non-ultrasound ICU vs. 0.20 in the ultrasound ICU.

Related Links:

Long Island Jewish Hospital North Shore-LIJ Health System



Gold Member
STI Test
Vivalytic Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Array
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Hybrid Arch Device
Neo EDE
Medical Adhesive
MED 5570U
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Sphere-9 is the first all-in-one mapping and ablation, large-tip focal, dual-energy catheter to be CE marked for ventricular ablation (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Dual-Energy Mapping and Ablation Catheter Receives CE Mark for Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes, can be life-threatening and often occur in patients with advanced heart disease. Although catheter ablation... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.