We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Concerns Over Avoiding Mammography Due to Overestimation of Radiation Exposure

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 20 May 2014
In a study to determine the baseline perception of the radiation associated with mammography screening among patients presenting for initial or follow-up imaging, women were asked to rate the amount of radiation received in a single mammogram as being significantly less, slightly less, about the same, slightly more, or substantially more compared to a series of radiation benchmarks. More...


Confusion and misinformation about the risks associated with ionizing radiation create increased public concern and worry, and may result in avoidance of screening mammography that can identify early cancers. None of the study participants accurately ordered all six of the benchmarks; on average, they considerably overestimated the amount of radiation associated with a mammogram in comparison to other radiation benchmarks.

“Our findings indicate a need to educate patients about the amount of radiation they are exposed to during a single screening mammogram,” said Jacqueline Hollada, a member of the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA; USA) research team. “Using everyday sources of radiation exposure as benchmarks can help add perspective and improve patients’ understanding of radiation levels associated with mammography, thereby reducing anxiety related to the examination.”

The authors concluded that medical staff should make concentrated effort to accurately inform women of the risks and benefits of mammography--specifically emphasizing the low dose of mammographic ionizing radiation--and provide objective facts to ensure that women make informed decisions about screening.

Ms. Hollada presented her study’s findings at the 2014 American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) annual meeting, held in San Diego (CA, USA), on May 4–9, 2014.

Related Links:

University of California Los Angeles



Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Immobilization System
Cranial 4Pi Immobilization
Fetal Monitor
BT-380
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Sphere-9 is the first all-in-one mapping and ablation, large-tip focal, dual-energy catheter to be CE marked for ventricular ablation (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Dual-Energy Mapping and Ablation Catheter Receives CE Mark for Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes, can be life-threatening and often occur in patients with advanced heart disease. Although catheter ablation... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.