We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Proton Therapy Has Better Outcome over IMRT for Advanced Head and Neck Cancers

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 21 Jul 2014
Radiation oncologists compared the world’s literature on outcomes of proton beam therapy in the treatment of a range of advanced head and neck cancers of the skull base compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and found that proton beam therapy significantly improved disease-free survival and tumor control when compared to IMRT. More...


The study’s findings were published June 27, 2014, in the journal Lancet Oncology. “We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients treated with proton therapy with patients receiving photon IMRT,” said senior author Robert Foote, MD, a radiation oncologist at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA). “Our findings suggest that the theoretical advantages of proton beam therapy may in fact be real.”

Researchers reviewed cases of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors through extensive database searches. They included studies of patients who had no earlier treatment—neither primary radiation therapy nor adjuvant radiation therapy—and patients who had recurrent disease. Researchers collected data on overall survival, disease-free survival, and tumor control, at five years and at the patient’s longest follow-up. They used random-effect models to pool outcomes across studies and compared event rates of combined outcomes for proton therapy and IMRT using an interaction test.

Researchers discovered disease-free survival to be significantly higher at five years for patients receiving proton therapy than for patients receiving IMRT (72% versus 50%). Tumor control did not differ between treatment groups at five years however tumor control was higher for patients receiving proton therapy than for IMRT at the longest follow-up (81% versus 64%).


Related Links:

Mayo Clinic



Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Immobilization System
Cranial 4Pi Immobilization
Patient Monitoring System
AlarmSense
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Sphere-9 is the first all-in-one mapping and ablation, large-tip focal, dual-energy catheter to be CE marked for ventricular ablation (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Dual-Energy Mapping and Ablation Catheter Receives CE Mark for Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular complexes, can be life-threatening and often occur in patients with advanced heart disease. Although catheter ablation... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.