We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Cancer Risk Due to CT is Not Fully Appreciated

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 06 Jul 2016
Researchers at the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatoon, Canada) conducted a survey among 328 medical professionals in Saskatchewan province to assess healthcare providers' knowledge regarding radiation dosing from CT scans. More...
To do so, they queried them regarding the average radiation dose from an abdominal-pelvic CT, which is 10 millisieverts (mSv), compared to 0.02-0.2 mSv from one chest x-ray, which indicates that the radiation dose from an abdominal-pelvic CT scan is between 100-250 times that of a chest radiograph.

The results showed that 73% of physicians, 97% of radiologists, and 76% of technologists correctly identified that there is an increased cancer risk from one abdominal-pelvic CT. However, just 18% of physicians, 28% of radiologists, and 22% of technologists were able to correctly identify the dose in relation to chest x-rays. And although 48% of physicians, 78% of radiologists, and 63% of technologists either accurately estimated or overestimated this dose, many respondents underestimated the dose level.

The survey also showed that 93% of respondents were interested in radiation dose feedback when considering ordering a CT scan. Another interesting finding was that there is some confusion regarding radiation exposure from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound. While MRIs and ultrasounds do not employ ionizing radiation, 20% of physicians, 6% of radiologists, and 7% of technologists attribute radiation exposure to MRI, and 11% of physicians and 7% of technologists believed an ultrasound used radiation. The study was published on June 22, 2016, in the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences.

“Healthcare providers, including physicians, radiologists, and medical imaging technologists are often not aware of radiation doses for common CT scans,” said lead author David Leswick, MD. “It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of radiation dose levels and risks from imaging tests for several reasons, including the ability to weigh the risks and benefits of tests, counsel patients on relevant risks, optimize protocols to minimize radiation dose, and select appropriate protocols to minimize radiation dose.”

The researcher suggested that automated dose calculation software and radiology information systems could be integrated into electronic ordering, which would give doctors immediate access to radiation dosage information when considering ordering a scan.

Related Links:
University of Saskatchewan



Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Patient Monitoring System
AlarmSense
Medical Examination & Procedure Light
Vega 80
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Surgical Techniques

view channel
Image: Graphical Abstract (Aoibhin M. Sheedy et al., A replenishable peritoneal implant for localized delivery and peritoneal fluid sampling in ovarian cancer, Device (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.device.2026.101050)

New Implant Provides Sustained Localized Therapy for Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages because symptoms such as bloating, pain, and pelvic pressure are nonspecific. Standard care relies on surgery and systemic therapy, yet tools for targeted... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.