Steps Taken to Assess Any Possible Risk with Low-Dose Radiation Exposure

researchers are incorporating radiation dose exposure reports into the electronic health record (EHR), an effort that they hope will lead to an accurate assessment of whether any cancer risk is associated with low-dose radiation exposure from medical imaging tests.

The electronic medical record allows for the storage, retrieval, and manipulation of one's medical records. The investigators, from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH; Bethesda, MD, USA) Clinical Center, published their research in the February 2010 issue of the Journal of the American College of Radiology (JACR).

There is much controversy surrounding diagnostic medical radiation exposure. "One widely publicized appraisal of medical radiation exposure suggested that about 1.5-2% of all cancers in the U.S. might be caused by the clinical use of CT alone,” said David A. Bluemke, M.D., lead author of the article and director of radiology and imaging sciences at the NIH Clinical Center. "Since there is no epidemiologic data directly relating CT scanning to cancer deaths, scientific assessment must instead rely on the relationship between radiation exposure and death rates from Japanese atomic bomb survivors. While the legitimacy of this approach remains debated, radiologists as well as clinicians may rightfully be confused by the ongoing controversy. Patients seeking medical help may legitimately question the rationale of, and any risks from, diagnostic radiology tests,” said Bluemke.

Radiology and nuclear medicine specialists at the NIH Clinical Center have developed a radiation reporting policy that will be instituted in cooperation with major equipment vendors, beginning with exposures from CT and PET/CT. "All vendors who sell imaging equipment to radiology and imaging sciences at the NIH Clinical Center will be required to provide a routine means for radiation dose exposure to be recorded in the electronic medical record. This requirement will allow cataloging of radiation exposures from these medical tests,” said Dr. Bluemke. Moreover, radiology at NIH will also require that vendors ensure that radiation exposure can be tracked by the patient in their own personal health record.

This approach is consistent with the American College of Radiology's (Reston, VA, USA) and Radiological Society of North America's (Oak Brook, IL, USA) stated recommendation that, "patients should keep a record of their X-ray history.”

"The cancer risk from low-dose medical radiation tests is largely unknown. Yet, it is clear that the U.S. population is increasingly being exposed to more diagnostic-test-derived ionizing radiation than in the past. While these steps themselves are not sufficient to allow population-based assessment of cancer risk from low-dose radiation, they are nonetheless necessary to begin a data set for this determination. The accumulation of medical testing doses of hundreds of thousands of individuals in the United States over many years will ultimately be necessary. We encourage all medical imaging facilities to include similar requirements for radiation-dose-reporting outputs from the manufacturers of radiation-producing medical equipment,” concluded Dr. Bluemke.

Related Links:
National Institutes of Health