We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
ARAB HEALTH - INFORMA

Download Mobile App




New Research Helps Choose Most Ideal Hip Implant for Replacement Surgery

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 12 Nov 2024
Print article
Image: The study compared patient outcomes following treatment with LBMT versus CDT for intermediate-risk PE (Photo courtesy of Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol)
Image: The study compared patient outcomes following treatment with LBMT versus CDT for intermediate-risk PE (Photo courtesy of Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol)

The likelihood of needing a revision surgery after a primary hip replacement is influenced in part by the materials used in the prosthesis. Current data often groups these materials into broad categories, which may mask differences in the revision risks between them. National joint replacement surgery registries typically categorize hip implants in a way that doesn't fully capture the variations in revision risks across different implant materials. Now, a new study has revealed that hip implants with a delta ceramic or oxidized zirconium head paired with a highly crosslinked polyethylene liner or cup present the lowest revision risk over a 15-year period. The independently conducted research, published in PLOS Medicine, offers valuable insights that can guide hospitals, surgeons, and patients in selecting the appropriate hip implant for replacement surgery.

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Bristol (Bristol, UK), aimed to identify hip implant materials that carry the least risk of requiring revision. This knowledge can assist orthopedic surgeons and patients in making more informed decisions before surgery. The researchers analyzed data from the National Joint Registry (NJR) on 1,026,481 hip replacement surgeries performed in the NHS and private sectors across England and Wales, tracking patients for up to 15 years after their initial operations (from 2003 to 2019). The analysis focused on the bearing surfaces of hip implants, which are the moving parts of the artificial joint that rub against each other during activity.

The findings showed that hip implants featuring a delta ceramic or oxidized zirconium head combined with a highly crosslinked polyethylene liner or cup had the lowest revision rates throughout the 15 years following the initial surgery. The researchers also examined the specific reasons for the revisions and confirmed these results. The data indicated that 20,869 (2%) of hip replacement patients required a revision surgery. By tracking material combinations and their corresponding revision rates, the study emphasizes how material choice can affect surgical outcomes, improving the longevity of the implants and supporting better patient health. Surgeons are encouraged to carefully review these findings when selecting implant materials and incorporate this information into pre-operative discussions with their patients. As the demand for joint replacements continues to grow, this research provides invaluable insight into reducing the need for revision surgeries.

“Our research has found the risk of hip replacement revision depends on the hip implant materials used in the original surgery. The lowest risk of revision are from implants with delta ceramic or oxidized zirconium head and a highly crosslinked polyethylene (HCLPE) liner or cup,” said Dr. Erik Lenguerrand, Senior Lecturer at the University of Bristol and a senior author on the paper. “Further research is needed to find out the association of implant materials with the risk of rehospitalization, re-operation other than revision, mortality, and the cost-effectiveness of these materials.”

 

Gold Member
Real-Time Diagnostics Onscreen Viewer
GEMweb Live
New
Gold Member
X-Ray QA Meter
T3 AD Pro
New
Electric Cast Saw
CC4 System
New
Documentation System For Blood Banks
HettInfo II

Print article

Channels

Critical Care

view channel
Image: The UbiqVue 2A Multiparameter System is based around a wearable ciosensor with chest-based SpO2 (Photo courtesy of LifeSignals)

Multiparameter System Featuring Wearable Biosensor Enables Continuous, Near Real-Time Patient Monitoring

A novel cloud-based system featuring a wearable biosensor with chest-based SpO2 monitoring enables continuous patient monitoring across both hospital and out-of-hospital care settings. The UbiqVue 2A... Read more

Patient Care

view channel
Image: The portable biosensor platform uses printed electrochemical sensors for the rapid, selective detection of Staphylococcus aureus (Photo courtesy of AIMPLAS)

Portable Biosensor Platform to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections

Approximately 4 million patients in the European Union acquire healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) or nosocomial infections each year, with around 37,000 deaths directly resulting from these infections,... Read more

Health IT

view channel
Image: First ever institution-specific model provides significant performance advantage over current population-derived models (Photo courtesy of Mount Sinai)

Machine Learning Model Improves Mortality Risk Prediction for Cardiac Surgery Patients

Machine learning algorithms have been deployed to create predictive models in various medical fields, with some demonstrating improved outcomes compared to their standard-of-care counterparts.... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image: The acoustic pipette uses sound waves to test for biomarkers in blood (Photo courtesy of Patrick Campbell/CU Boulder)

Handheld, Sound-Based Diagnostic System Delivers Bedside Blood Test Results in An Hour

Patients who go to a doctor for a blood test often have to contend with a needle and syringe, followed by a long wait—sometimes hours or even days—for lab results. Scientists have been working hard to... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2024 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.