We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Sekisui Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Reduces Rates of Postoperative Infection

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 10 Nov 2009
A new study has shown that minimally invasive laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy procedures result in less postoperative infection and reduced length of stay in the hospital, when compared to open abdominal hysterectomy.

Researchers at Women First of Louisville (KY, USA) conducted a retrospective analysis on 15,404 patients using claims data from a large U.S. More...
managed care plan, to compare minimally invasive procedures (MIP) hysterectomy with the traditional open abdominal hysterectomy method, by evaluating clinical and economic outcomes and use. Data were collected on intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay, rates of readmission, and insurer and patient payment totals for inpatient and outpatient procedures.

The results showed that MIP were performed in 43% of subjects, with 23% (3,520) undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy, and 20% (3,130) a vaginal hysterectomy. The postoperative infection rates for patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy were 18%, higher than those undergoing laparoscopic (15%) and vaginal hysterectomy (14%). With open abdominal hysterectomy, length of stay was 3.7 days versus 1.6 and 2.2 days, respectively, for patients undergoing MIP laparoscopic and MIP vaginal hysterectomy. Unadjusted expenditures for patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy averaged US$12,086, whereas MIP (laparoscopic and vaginal) patients accrued costs of $10,868 and $9544, respectively. When expenditures were adjusted for differences in patient mix, there was no difference for open abdominal hysterectomy versus MIP laparoscopic; however, there were significantly lower expenditures for MIP vaginal versus open abdominal hysterectomy, with a mean difference of $1,270; adjusted expenditures associated with outpatient MIP were markedly lower than expenditures for inpatient open abdominal hysterectomy. The study was published in the September 2009 issue of The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.

"In this age of comparative effectiveness, this study shows that when it comes to hysterectomy, a minimally invasive approach gives physicians the opportunity to increase the quality of care women are receiving while potentially saving the healthcare system millions of dollars,” said lead author Lori Warren, M.D. "Clinicians who have had concerns that minimally invasive procedures may be riskier for patients should be reassured because this real-world data demonstrates the overall complication rate is actually higher with the open abdominal approach.”

Among the three methods of hysterectomy, open abdominal hysterectomy remains the most common approach as 70 % of all procedures are still performed in this manner, despite the emerging benefits of minimally invasive approaches.

Related Links:

Women First of Louisville




Gold Member
Handheld Blood Glucose Analyzer
STAT-Site
Radiology Monitor
MDNC-6121 Barco Nio Color 5.8MP
Blood Pressure Monitor
Cuff Blood Pressure Monitor
Desk Aneroid Sphyg
Diagnostix 750D+
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Artificial Intelligence

view channel
Image: Clinical LLM Performance Improves by >300% When Provided with High-Quality Real-World Evidence in New Precision Medicine Benchmark (Photo courtesy of Atropos Health)

New Benchmark Highlights Evidence Gaps in AI Responses to Clinical Questions

Many clinical decisions still rely on limited evidence, while most artificial intelligence benchmarks overlook the patient context that shapes real-world care. General large language models can also struggle... Read more

Critical Care

view channel
Image Credit: Adobe Stock

New ECG Foundation Model Enables Broad Cardiac Diagnosis and Risk Prediction

Electrocardiograms are central to cardiovascular decision-making, but conventional artificial intelligence models are often trained for narrow tasks, such as detecting a single arrhythmia.... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Identifies Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults Without Diabetes

Dysglycemia—abnormal blood glucose regulation—can fluctuate throughout the day and often escape conventional screening. Clinicians typically rely on fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c, which offer... Read more

Business

view channel
Image: LigaSure RAS Maryland, designed for the Valleylab FT10 platform on Hugo RAS, seals and cuts vessels, tissue, and lymphatics up to 7 mm in diameter (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Medtronic Receives FDA Clearance for Vessel-Sealing Instrument for Robotic Surgery

As robotic-assisted surgery expands across U.S. hospitals, teams increasingly seek energy instruments with the familiarity and performance of tools used in open and laparoscopic procedures.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.