We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Few Breast Cancer Surgeons Follow Quality of Care Standards

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 19 Jan 2010
A new study claims that a majority of breast cancer surgeons' practices do not follow standards associated with the best quality of care, including consulting with other specialists and providing resources and education to help patients make treatment decisions.

Researchers at the University of Michigan (U-M; Ann Arbor, USA) surveyed 318 surgeons who treated breast cancer patients in the Detroit (MI, USA) and Los Angeles (CA, USA) metropolitan areas. More...
The surgeons were asked about the processes and services available in their practice, including consulting with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and plastic surgeons; collecting or reviewing biopsy specimens or mammograms; offering patient education videos or presentations, and connecting patients with peers, for example through support groups. The measures were developed by the researchers based on accepted standards in other areas of chronic care.

The researchers found that only one-quarter to one-third of surgeons reported they had routinely discussed patients' treatment plans with medical or radiation oncologists; only 13% routinely consulted with a plastic surgeon. About one-third of surgeons said their patients typically participate in patient decision-support activities, such as viewing informational video or Web-based materials, or attending peer support programs. Surgeons who treated mostly breast cancer patients were more likely to report these services, compared to surgeons who saw fewer breast cancer patients. The study was published in the January 2010 issue of Medical Care.

"Despite the mantra for multidisciplinary decision-making and care intake for patients, surgeons in the community are reporting relatively little of that in their practices,” said lead author professor of internal medicine Steven Katz, M.D., M.P.H. "Either doctors are not convinced these elements matter, or there are logistical constraints in terms of building these standards into their practices. What the implications are for patients is unknown. These results suggest patients might find a more integrated practice among surgeons with higher volume.”

Related Links:

University of Michigan



New
Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
New
X-Ray Generator
Advantage Plus Generators
New
POC Respiratory/Sore Throat Test
BIOFIRE SPOTFIRE (R/ST) Panel
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Health IT

view channel
Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock

Automated System Classifies and Tracks Cardiogenic Shock Across Hospital Settings

Cardiogenic shock remains a difficult, time-sensitive emergency, with delayed identification driving poor outcomes and persistently high mortality. Many cases go undocumented even at advanced stages, hindering... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.