We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Sekisui Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Preventive Mastectomy Does Not Improve Five-Year Breast-Cancer Survival

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 29 Mar 2010
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM), a preventive mastectomy of a healthy breast, does not increase survival rates in most women with cancer in the other, according to a new study. More...


Researchers at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study database to identify 107,106 women with breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy for treatment between 1998 and 2003, and a subset of 8,902 women who also underwent CPM during the same period. Associations between predictor variables and the likelihood of undergoing CPM were evaluated, and risk-stratified adjusted survival analyses were performed for estrogen-receptor [ER] status, cancer stage, and age, using Cox regression.

The results showed that CPM was associated with improved disease-specific survival; but only patients younger than age 50 with early-stage cancer and estrogen-receptor-negative tumor experienced an improvement in their chance of five-year survival, a group that represents less than 10% of breast cancer patients. The study found that women in this group had a 4.8% increased chance of surviving five years, compared with women who did not have a preventive mastectomy. The researchers also found that women with ER-positive tumors in the absence of prophylactic mastectomy also had a lower overall risk for contralateral breast cancer than women with ER-negative tumors do. The study was published in the March 17, 2010, issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI).

"We hope this study helps women make better decisions,” said lead author Isabelle Bedrosian, M.D., an assistant professor in MD Anderson's surgical oncology department. "The results provide some reassurance that perhaps a (preventive) mastectomy is not necessary, perhaps overly aggressive and perhaps a bit too much.”

Preventive mastectomy is the surgical removal of one or both breasts. Existing data suggest that preventive single or double mastectomy may significantly reduce the chance of developing breast cancer in moderate- and high-risk women, such as those with previous breast cancer, a family history of breast cancer, women who test positive for mutations in certain genes that increase the risk of breast cancer (such as the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene), women with lobular carcinoma in situ, and women with diffuse and indeterminate breast microcalcifications.

Related Links:

MD Anderson Cancer Center




Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
Radiology Monitor
MDNC-6121 Barco Nio Color 5.8MP
Patient Monitoring System
AlarmSense
Fetal Monitor
BT-380
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Artificial Intelligence

view channel
Image: Clinical LLM Performance Improves by >300% When Provided with High-Quality Real-World Evidence in New Precision Medicine Benchmark (Photo courtesy of Atropos Health)

New Benchmark Highlights Evidence Gaps in AI Responses to Clinical Questions

Many clinical decisions still rely on limited evidence, while most artificial intelligence benchmarks overlook the patient context that shapes real-world care. General large language models can also struggle... Read more

Critical Care

view channel
Image Credit: Adobe Stock

New ECG Foundation Model Enables Broad Cardiac Diagnosis and Risk Prediction

Electrocardiograms are central to cardiovascular decision-making, but conventional artificial intelligence models are often trained for narrow tasks, such as detecting a single arrhythmia.... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Identifies Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults Without Diabetes

Dysglycemia—abnormal blood glucose regulation—can fluctuate throughout the day and often escape conventional screening. Clinicians typically rely on fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c, which offer... Read more

Business

view channel
Image: LigaSure RAS Maryland, designed for the Valleylab FT10 platform on Hugo RAS, seals and cuts vessels, tissue, and lymphatics up to 7 mm in diameter (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Medtronic Receives FDA Clearance for Vessel-Sealing Instrument for Robotic Surgery

As robotic-assisted surgery expands across U.S. hospitals, teams increasingly seek energy instruments with the familiarity and performance of tools used in open and laparoscopic procedures.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.