We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Sepsis the Most Common Peril in General Surgery Patients

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 05 Aug 2010
Sepsis and septic shock are more prevalent than pulmonary embolism (PE) and myocardial infarction (MI) in general surgery patients, according to a new study.

Researchers at the Methodist Hospital Weill Cornell Medical College (Houston, TX, USA) conducted a retrospective review of all general-surgery patients included in the 2005-2007 U.S. More...
national surgical quality improvement program data set maintained by the American College of Surgeons (ACS; Chicago, IL, USA). The researchers documented the incidence, mortality rate, and risk factors for sepsis and septic shock, compared with PE and ME in the general-surgery population. The main outcome measures were incidence, mortality rate, and risk factors for sepsis and septic shock.

The results showed that of 363,897 general surgery patients, sepsis occurred in 8,350 (2.3%), septic shock in 5,977 (1.6%), PE in 1,078 (0.3%), and MI in 615 (0.2%); the septic-shock group had a greater percentage of patients older than 60 years. Thirty-day mortality rates for each of the groups were as follows: 5.4% for sepsis, 33.7% for septic shock, 9.1% for PE, and 32% for MI. The need for emergency surgery resulted in more cases of sepsis (4.5%) and septic shock (4.9%) than did elective surgery. The presence of any comorbidity increased the risk of sepsis and septic shock 6-fold, and increased the 30-day mortality rate 22-fold. The study was published in the July 2010 issue of the Archives of Surgery.

"Mortality rates in patients with sepsis and septic shock exceed those of MI and PE combined by nearly 10-fold,” concluded lead author Laura Moore, M.D., and colleagues of the department of surgery. "Therefore, our level of vigilance in identifying sepsis and septic shock needs to mimic, if not surpass, our vigilance for identifying MI and PE. Further evaluation of the role of sepsis screening programs in other settings is critical and could significantly reduce sepsis-related mortality in general-surgery patients.”

Related Links:

Methodist Hospital Weill Cornell Medical College
American College of Surgeons



New
Gold Member
Neonatal Heel Incision Device
Tenderfoot
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
New
Rapid Sepsis Test
SeptiCyte RAPID
New
Immobilization System
Cranial 4Pi Immobilization
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Health IT

view channel
Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock

Automated System Classifies and Tracks Cardiogenic Shock Across Hospital Settings

Cardiogenic shock remains a difficult, time-sensitive emergency, with delayed identification driving poor outcomes and persistently high mortality. Many cases go undocumented even at advanced stages, hindering... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.