We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Shockwaves Work Better Than Surgery for Removing Small Stones in the Ureter

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 02 Dec 2010
A new study states that extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) should be the treatment of first choice in patients with a ureteric stone of up to one centimeter.

Researchers at the University Federico II (Naples, Italy) conducted a prospective randomized study involving 273 patients with single distal ureteric stones ranging from 0.5 cm - 1.5 cm, and compared the use of ESWL (137 patients) using an electromagnetic lithotripter to uretoscopy (URS, 136 patients), where an ureteroscope is passed into the distal ureter to remove the stone. More...
Patients in both groups were compared for overall stone-free rates (SFRs), re-treatment rates, need for auxiliary procedures, and complication rates. A subgroup analysis was performed in both groups according to stone size.

The results showed that the patients in the ESWL group achieved a 92.7% overall SFR, with a 44.88% re-treatment rate and an 11.02% auxiliary procedure rate; complications occurred in 15.32% of patients treated with ESWL. Patients in the URS group achieved a 94.85% overall SFR, with a re-treatment rate of 7.75% and an auxiliary procedure rate of 18.60%; complications occurred in 19.11% of patients treated with URS. The need for re-treatments and for auxiliary procedures, as well as the incidence of complications was significantly higher in patients with stones larger than one centimeter in the ESWL group. In patients with stones smaller than one centimeter treated with ESWL, the need for re-treatments and auxiliary procedures, as well as the incidence of complications, was significantly lower than for those treated with URS. The study was published in the December 2010 issue of the British Journal of Urology International (BJUI).

"Statistical analysis showed no significant differences in overall stone free rates, treatment duration, complications, and the need for auxiliary procedures,” said coauthor Professor Vincenzo Mirone, M.D., of the department of urology. "However, there were clear differences in both groups when we divided them into patients with stones of up to one centimeter and stones of over one centimeter.”

"Approximately one in three adults with kidney stones will have a distal ureteric stone at some point in their lives. Most stones with a diameter of up to 0.5 centimeter will be expelled spontaneously when the patient urinates without requiring any active intervention. For larger stones that get stuck in the ureter, spontaneous expulsion is very difficult and requires active intervention,” added Professor Mirone.

Related Links:

University Federico II





New
Gold Member
Handheld Blood Glucose Analyzer
STAT-Site
Antipsychotic TDM Assays
Saladax Antipsychotic Assays
New
Patient Monitoring System
AlarmSense
New
Surgical System
Stealth AXiS
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Health IT

view channel
Photo courtesy of Adobe Stock

Automated System Classifies and Tracks Cardiogenic Shock Across Hospital Settings

Cardiogenic shock remains a difficult, time-sensitive emergency, with delayed identification driving poor outcomes and persistently high mortality. Many cases go undocumented even at advanced stages, hindering... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.