We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us
Sekisui Diagnostics

Download Mobile App




Expensive Hip Implants Show No Added Benefit

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 19 Dec 2018
A new study finds no evidence that newer implants such as ceramic or uncemented implants are better than traditional cemented metal-on-plastic ones.

Researchers at the University of Bristol Medical School (United Kingdom) conducted a study that compared 24 different types of hip implants commonly used in clinical practice. More...
To do so, they combined data from the U.K. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and the Northern Ireland with the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, analyzing in all over one million patients with total hip replacement in the two countries and with over 30 years follow-up. Implants, which are no longer recommended for use, such as metal-on-metal and resurfacing implants, were excluded from analyses.

The implants were then ranked by cost-effectiveness for each patient group of different sex and age profiles. The results revealed that small-head (less than 36 mm in diameter) cemented metal-on-plastic hip replacements are the most cost-effective in men and women older than 65 years. For adults younger than 65, small-head cemented ceramic-on-plastic hip replacements are more cost-effective. There was no evidence that uncemented or hybrid hip replacements are cost-effective options, while large-head implant sizes (more than 36 mm) are also not cost-effective. The study was published on November 1, 2018, in Value Health.

“Small-head cemented metal-on-plastic implants have the longest track-record of use; they are safe and the cheapest implant type on the market, but tend only to be favored for older patients,” said lead author Elsa Marques, PhD, of the University of Bristol Medical School Translational Health Sciences (THS). “Regardless of their bearing material, there is no effectiveness or cost-effectiveness evidence that uncemented implants last longer and avoid revision surgeries for any patient group.”

Modern uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic and uncemented ceramic-on-plastic are considerably more expensive than the older cemented metal-on-plastic hips, although there is little evidence that they avoid the need for revision surgeries in the longer term. But despite lack of cost-effectiveness evidence, uncemented or hybrid combinations are increasingly used in younger adults worldwide. Metal-on-plastic implants also remain the most commonly used bearing surface material in Sweden, Norway, Australia, and the United States.

Related Links:
University of Bristol Medical School


Gold Member
STI Test
Vivalytic Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Array
Radiology Monitor
MDNC-6121 Barco Nio Color 5.8MP
Patient Preoperative Skin Preparation
BD ChloraPrep
Medical Adhesive
MED 5570U
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Artificial Intelligence

view channel
Image: Clinical LLM Performance Improves by >300% When Provided with High-Quality Real-World Evidence in New Precision Medicine Benchmark (Photo courtesy of Atropos Health)

New Benchmark Highlights Evidence Gaps in AI Responses to Clinical Questions

Many clinical decisions still rely on limited evidence, while most artificial intelligence benchmarks overlook the patient context that shapes real-world care. General large language models can also struggle... Read more

Critical Care

view channel
Image: The findings suggest that hematopoietic cell transplantation may benefit patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome soon after high-risk features are detected, before advanced malignancy develops. (Image Credit: Shutterstock)

Early Stem Cell Transplantation May Improve Survival in Rare Inherited Bone Marrow Disorder

Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is a rare inherited bone marrow disorder that can progress to severe hematologic disease. More than 90% of affected children survive beyond age 20, but fewer than 30% live... Read more

Point of Care

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Identifies Cardiometabolic Risk in Adults Without Diabetes

Dysglycemia—abnormal blood glucose regulation—can fluctuate throughout the day and often escape conventional screening. Clinicians typically rely on fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c, which offer... Read more

Business

view channel
Image: LigaSure RAS Maryland, designed for the Valleylab FT10 platform on Hugo RAS, seals and cuts vessels, tissue, and lymphatics up to 7 mm in diameter (Photo courtesy of Medtronic)

Medtronic Receives FDA Clearance for Vessel-Sealing Instrument for Robotic Surgery

As robotic-assisted surgery expands across U.S. hospitals, teams increasingly seek energy instruments with the familiarity and performance of tools used in open and laparoscopic procedures.... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.