We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Type of Anesthesia May Impact Surgical Site Infections

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 12 Aug 2010
A new study suggests that patients receiving a total hip or knee replacement have a higher incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) when the procedure is performed under general anesthesia (GA) than when the same procedures were performed under regional anesthesia. More...


Researchers at Taipei Medical University Hospital (Taiwan) used the Taiwanese Longitudinal Health Insurance Database to compare the risk of SSI within 30 days of surgery for patients receiving total hip or knee replacement under GA, versus those under epidural or spinal anesthesia; a total of 3,081 patients who underwent primary total hip or knee replacement from 2002 to 2006 were included in the study. Multivariate logistic regression and propensity score analyses were carried out to explore the relationship between method of surgical anesthesia and SSI occurring within 30 days of surgery.

The results showed that of the 3,081 sampled patients, 56 patients (1.8%) had 30-day SSIs; 33 of them had undergone GA (2.8% of all under GA), while 23 of them received epidural or spinal anesthesia (1.2% of all under epidural or spinal anesthesia). The researchers calculated that the odds of SSI in patients receiving total hip or knee replacement under general anesthesia were 2.21 times higher than those who had the same procedure under epidural or spinal anesthesia, after adjustment for the patient's age, sex, the year of surgery, comorbidities, surgeon's age, and hospital teaching status. The study was published in the August 2010 issue of Anesthesiology.

"Many anesthetics used in general anesthesia have been shown to compromise immunity responses,” said lead author Chuen-Chau Chang, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D., and colleagues of the department of anesthesiology. "Anesthetic choices may impact a patient beyond the operating room and hospital stay which could increase in-hospital and postdischarge financial burdens.”

Among the possible reasons why spinal and epidural anesthesia demonstrated lower infection rates are that they modulate the inflammatory response to surgery and may better allow the body to focus on fighting bacteria; they may also improve the body's ability to carry oxygen to tissue, as well as provide excellent analgesia even after surgery.

Related Links:
Taipei Medical University Hospital



Gold Member
STI Test
Vivalytic Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Array
Gold Member
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Sample-To-Answer Test
SARS‑CoV‑2/Flu A/Flu B/RSV Cartridge (CE-IVD)
New
Medical Adhesive
MED 5570U
New
Medical-Grade Display
HL2316SHTB
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.