We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies. Cookie Policy.

Features Partner Sites Information LinkXpress hp
Sign In
Advertise with Us

Download Mobile App




Events

05 Aug 2026 - 07 Aug 2026
18 Aug 2026 - 20 Aug 2026

“Incidental Findings” Found to Be Unusual but Significant Events in Pediatric CT Imaging

By HospiMedica International staff writers
Posted on 23 Sep 2013
The largest study of computed tomographic (CT) imaging scans taken in emergency departments across the United States for children with head injuries revealed the prevalence of “incidental findings,” i.e., results that were not expected from the injury, and categorized them by urgency.

The article was published in the August 2013 issue of the journal Pediatrics, and provides a context for doctors in emergency departments who encounter these situations. More...
“Incidental findings are a rare but significant event,” said Dr. Nathan Kuppermann, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the University of California (UC) Davis Medical Center (Sacramento, USA) and lead investigator of the study. “It is important for doctors to look for abnormalities other than what they expect to find and to be prepared to interpret and communicate these findings to families.”

The study involved nearly 44,000 children seen for a head injury in 25 hospital emergency departments nationwide. Nearly 16,000 had CT scans to evaluate an injury, and approximately 4% of the scans revealed incidental findings ranging from enlarged tonsils to life-threatening tumors. Children with a known pre-existing brain abnormality were excluded from the analysis.

The researchers also classified the incidental findings into three categories: those that required immediate assessment or treatment, those that needed appropriate timely outpatient follow-up, and those that merited further investigation only if the problems were causing symptoms. Only 0.1% of the overall sample of CT scans fell into the most serious category.

Because of the small percentage of patients with the most urgent incidental findings, the study authors did recommend any changes to current CT scan guidelines. They believe emergency medicine physicians should continue to perform CT scans in children as is medically justified for their injury because a CT scan entails a small but known long-term risk of cancer from radiation exposure.

Advanced imaging studies, genetic analysis, and other high-technology tests have made it possible to gather data that neither the clinician nor patient expects. Determining what to do with these findings, particularly if they are likely to be insignificant to a patient’s health, can create a predicament for physicians. The authors believe physicians should weigh the patient’s right to know against financial costs and potential negative health effects from worry, further testing and perhaps even unnecessary treatment brought on by learning of the findings.

“Because the practice of medicine has embraced technologies that provide information beyond the actual clinical question, a need to develop strategies to handle unexpected information now exists,” said Alexander Rogers, assistant professor of pediatric emergency medicine at the University of Michigan Health System (Ann Arbor, USA), and lead author of the study. “Particularly in the emergency room, doctors must decide quickly whether and how to disclose information to a family with whom they have no prior relationship and do not know what their response is likely to be.”

This study is the largest pediatric multicenter description of the frequency of incidental findings on head CT scans. Moreover, it is a secondary analysis of a study that was designed to establish a decision rule for determining which children who present to the emergency room with a head injury should have a CT scan to evaluate it.

The pediatric head injury/trauma algorithm that resulted from this work has become standard in emergency departments worldwide and has helped reduce the number of unnecessary CT scans in children. Both studies were part of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN; Salt Lake City, UT, USA), the only US-funded pediatric emergency medicine research network. With participating academic and urban hospitals across the country, the network has access to a large number of demographically diverse populations of children being seen in emergency departments.

“The large size of this study enhances the value and generalizability of our findings,” said Dr. Kuppermann, who is the founding chair of PECARN and served as its chair until 2008. “Without the large, multicenter network provided by PECARN, we would be unable to have undertaken such a definitive study.”

Related Links:

University of Michigan Health System
University of California, Davis Medical Center
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network




Gold Member
Handheld Blood Glucose Analyzer
STAT-Site
Biochip Array Technology
Evidence MultiSTAT Drugs of Abuse Urine Multiplex Panel
Glucose Meter
StatStrip®
Medical-Grade Display
HL2316SHTB
Read the full article by registering today, it's FREE! It's Free!
Register now for FREE to HospiMedica.com and get access to news and events that shape the world of Hospital Medicine.
  • Free digital version edition of HospiMedica International sent by email on regular basis
  • Free print version of HospiMedica International magazine (available only outside USA and Canada).
  • Free and unlimited access to back issues of HospiMedica International in digital format
  • Free HospiMedica International Newsletter sent every week containing the latest news
  • Free breaking news sent via email
  • Free access to Events Calendar
  • Free access to LinkXpress new product services
  • REGISTRATION IS FREE AND EASY!
Click here to Register








Channels

Critical Care

view channel
Image Credit: 123RF

Existing Cardiovascular Risk Calculators Predict Several Common Cancers

Cardiovascular risk calculators are embedded in primary and secondary care to estimate 10‑year risk of heart attack or stroke from factors such as age, body mass index, and smoking. Many of these same... Read more
Copyright © 2000-2026 Globetech Media. All rights reserved.